Senator Godswill Akpabio

A member of the National Assembly Elections Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Justice Sheriff Hafizu, has said there were enough evidence to prove that Senator Godswill Akpabio was denied victory in the February 23 National Assembly election.

The Minister of Niger Delta Affairs and the All Progressives Congress candidate for the Akwa Ibom North West senatorial district had challenged the election of Dr. Chris Ekpenyong, of the People’s Democratic Party, who was declared the winner of the election.

Justice Hafizu in a minority judgement on  Wednesday night held that Akpabio won the election and ought to have been returned as the duly elected Senator for Akwa Ibom North West Senatorial District. 

ALSO READ: Why Presidential Tribunal Strikes Out Atiku, PDP’s Petitions Against Buhari

 The PUNCH reported that the W. O Akanbi-led tribunal had, in a majority judgement on Wednesday night, upheld the election of Dr. Chris Ekpenyong as the winner of the February 23rd National Assembly election and dismissed the petition of Godswill Akpabio.

Also Read:  Hardship/Security: Nigeria Is Going The Venezuela Way – PDP Governors Warn

 Akanbi with the concurrence of Justice Ebetu dismissed the petition on the grounds that it was too weak to support the allegations of none compliance with the electoral laws.

But in a dissenting minority judgement, Justice Hafizu held that the argument of the Respondents that Senator Akpabio ought to have called unit polling agents to prove his case was wrong adding that Akpabio had not challenged the results of the units and therefore there was nothing to prove.

According to him, the case of Senator Akpabio was cancellation of duly collated votes at INEC office which went beyond the units. 

ALSO READ:Tribunal Affirms Rev Waive’s Election Victory, Dismisses Mariere’s Petition

He said he found merit in the Petitioner’s case that his collated votes which showed that he won the election were cancelled by an INEC official to give  victory to the People’s Democratic Party candidate

Justice Hafizu also held that from the evidence adduced during the trial it was obvious that the Returning Officer had cancelled the votes of Obot Akara Local Government Area due to an established case of over-voting and said it was wrong for the same cancelled result to be revalidated in INEC office in Uyo. 

Also Read:  Many Missing, Houses Burnt In Akwa Ibom, Cross River’s Communities Boundary Dispute

The Minority Judge also submitted that the Witnesses of the Respondents were unreliable as they gave contradictory evidence during trial. 

He cited cases of witnesses who had alleged that they were abducted by APC thugs and forced to thumb-print for the party only for card reader reports to put a lie to such claims, a contention that the majority judgement glossed over.

According to Justice Hafizu, INEC was wrong to have cancelled the 61,329 votes by APC in Essien Udim Local Government Area against PDP score of 9,050 votes. He said the unlawful cancellation of the votes was a clear case of robbery since it did not follow the due process of INEC guidelines.

Accordingly, Justice Hafizu voided the declaration of Engr Ekpenyong as the winner of the election and declared his return invalid.

YOU MAY ALSO READ: NDDC Board: Why Buhari Sacked Prof Brambaifor, Others – Group

 He also declared Senator Akpabio as the winner of the election for having the majority of the lawful votes and ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to present a certificate of return to Senator Akpabio as the duly elected Senator of Akwa Ibom North West Senatorial District. 

Also Read:  Delta APC Chairman Accuses Ogboru Of Embezzling Over N2billion Election Funds

Supporters the APC and lawyers applauded the minority  judgement of Justice Hafizu, describing it as sound and bound to stand the test of time.

In his reaction, counsel for Senator Akpabio, Mr Adekunle Oyesanya ( SAN), praised Justice Hafizu for his courage in giving the dissenting judgement and expressed the readiness of Senator Akpabio to go on appeal, adding that Justice Hafizu’s minority judgement represented the position of the law.


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.